The market this week
- Brands
- 53read in 54 storefronts
- Total products
- 237,829includes apparel, footwear, accessories, home and beauty
- Median price
- €39.99
- Blended garments
- 63.5%
One fibre can be recycled; a blend cannot. Synthetics come from oil and gas. Fibre by fibre, the label decides how circular and climate-conscious a wardrobe is.
Sustainability reports describe intentions. Product pages show decisions. Every week we read the brands’ public product pages and record what each garment is made of, where it was made and what it costs. This page is that reading, week by week.
One fibre can be shredded and spun into new yarn. A blend, such as cotton with elastane, cannot be pulled apart and ends up as rags, insulation or landfill.
Synthetics are spun from oil and gas, and the factories that make them run on fossil fuels too. They also shed plastic fibres in the wash and do not rot.
A country is only the first step towards traceability. Knitting, dyeing, sewing and assembly can each happen in a different country, and one country on a page tells you nothing about which of those steps happened there, unless the brand discloses that too.
Synthetics lead at 46.0%, 4.5 points ahead of plant fibres.
Womenswear is 8.1 points more synthetic than the market as a whole.
The low tier is 2.8 points more synthetic than the market as a whole.
Single-material garments are the easiest to recycle, and the mid tier has the most of them, 5.4 points above the market.
High tier storefronts run the most single-material, a median 44.7% of their garments, mid tier storefronts 42.2%, low tier storefronts 29.9%.
Shirt leads at 63.0% single-material garments, 26.6 points above the market; the least is socks at 1.3%, almost all blends.
Single-material cotton garments cost about the same as blended cotton: 5% less.
25.6% of apparel garments disclose recycled content. A garment of one material can be recycled again without being taken apart; 69.8% of those with recycled content disclose it with another material, which has to be separated first.
China leads at 32.9%, then Bangladesh at 19.6% and Türkiye at 10.9%; the high tier is 53.8% Italy.
25.6% of garments carry a recycled claim: 8.2% backed by a standard, 17.4% the brand’s own word.
Of the most frequent materials, polyester is the most recycled: in 12.0% of garments with polyester the recycled claim cites a certification, and in another 30.2% it rests on the brand’s own word.
Recycled Claim Standard (RCS) leads at 8.2% of garments, Organic Content Standard (OCS) at 6.1%; no other standard passes 0.8%.
Almost every page lists the fibres; 6 in 10 leave out where the garment was made.
36,051 garments are on sale, at a median discount of 40.0%.
The low tier brings in 4,564 of them, more than the other tiers together.
Every brand in this record has its own reading for the week on sale: composition by fibre, single material share, origin, price and claims, as a file set. The market figures above are free to cite. The brand files are what we sell.
Every figure comes from brands’ own public product pages, collected automatically each week. No company reporting, no buy-in, no personal data. Artificial intelligence normalises fibre names and categories. Nothing is inferred.
Fibre names are mapped to the six material groups Textile Exchange uses in its Materials Market Report, so a weekly reading here can sit beside their annual one. We measure declared composition, not sustainability practice.
Free to cite for journalism, research, teaching and policy. Every tile has Cite, which copies its reading with the source line, and CSV, which downloads the series behind its chart.