The market this week
- Brands
- 35
- Total products
- 150,138includes apparel, footwear, accessories, home and beauty
- Median price
- €39.99
- Blended garments
- 62.3%
One fibre can be recycled; a blend cannot. Synthetics come from oil and gas. Fibre by fibre, the label decides how circular and climate-conscious a wardrobe is.
Sustainability reports describe intentions. Product pages show decisions. Every week we read the brands’ public product pages and record what each garment is made of, where it was made and what it costs. This page is that reading, week by week.
One fibre can be shredded and spun into new yarn. A blend, such as cotton with elastane, cannot be pulled apart and ends up as rags, insulation or landfill.
Synthetics are spun from oil and gas, and the factories that make them run on fossil fuels too. They also shed plastic fibres in the wash and do not rot.
A country is only the first step towards traceability. Knitting, dyeing, sewing and assembly can each happen in a different country, and one country on a page tells you nothing about which of those steps happened there, unless the brand discloses that too.
Synthetics lead at 47.2%, 6.7 points ahead of plant fibres.
Womenswear is 5.7 points more synthetic than the market as a whole.
The low tier is 3.6 points more synthetic than the market as a whole.
Single-material garments are the easiest to recycle, and the mid tier has the most of them, 5.8 points above the market.
High tier brands run the most single-material, a median 46.2% of their garments, mid tier brands 43.0%, low tier brands 32.0%.
Shirt leads at 64.7% single-material garments, 26.9 points above the market; the least is socks at 0.7%, almost all blends.
Single-material viscose (rayon) garments cost the same as blended viscose (rayon).
26.6% of apparel garments disclose recycled content. A garment of one material can be recycled again without being taken apart; 66.4% of those with recycled content disclose it with another material, which has to be separated first.
China leads at 29.9%, then Bangladesh at 19.3% and Türkiye at 10.1%; the high tier is 54.8% Italy.
26.6% of garments carry a recycled claim: 10.8% backed by a standard, 15.8% the brand’s own word.
Of the most frequent materials, polyester is the most recycled: in 13.0% of garments with polyester the recycled claim cites a certification, and in another 27.7% it rests on the brand’s own word.
Recycled Claim Standard (RCS) leads at 7.9% of garments, Organic Content Standard (OCS) at 5.9%; no other standard passes 2.9%.
Almost every page lists the fibres; 6 in 10 leave out where the garment was made.
16,095 garments are on sale, at a median discount of 31.9%.
The low tier brings in 1,019 of them, more than the other tiers together.
Every brand in this record has its own reading for the week on sale: composition by fibre, single material share, origin, price and claims, as a file set. The market figures above are free to cite. The brand files are what we sell.
Every figure comes from brands’ own public product pages, collected automatically each week. No company reporting, no buy-in, no personal data. Artificial intelligence normalises fibre names and categories. Nothing is inferred.
Fibre names are mapped to the six material groups Textile Exchange uses in its Materials Market Report, so a weekly reading here can sit beside their annual one. We measure declared composition, not sustainability practice.
Free to cite for journalism, research, teaching and policy. Every tile has Cite, which copies its reading with the source line, and CSV, which downloads the series behind its chart.